all 7 comments

[–]holymadness 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pulse, Pocket, Reader for Safari, Readability... lots of apps do the same thing.

Part of the answer is that Instapaper was one of the first to offer a time-shifting app and that its creator, Marco Arment, is particularly assiduous about regularly releasing useful updates and improvements. He is also a one-man team, which helps people personally connect to his business (people would rather give their money to a person than a faceless company).

The other part is that Arment is very good friends with a lot of high-profile Apple bloggers (Ben Brooks, John Gruber, Shawn Blanc, MG Siegler) who drive a ton of traffic to his site and app by praising it on their blogs. This also creates a lot of positive buzz and hype. He has been widely praised in traditional media circles and interviewed by papers like the NYTimes. The recent Starbucks promotion is another major marketing coup he's managed to pull off.

The long view is that the free services do not have a business model or revenue stream, and thus it's unclear how they'll continue to provide the service they offer without eventually being bought out by another company, monetizing via advertising, or charging a fee. Because Instapaper is profitable, Arment can continue to develop and support the software without compromising on user experience. That's reassuring to many.

[–]FekketCantenel 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

its creator, Marco Arment, is particularly assiduous about regularly releasing useful updates and improvements

I love Pocket (though Read It Later was a much better name), but get frustrated with their incredibly slow update schedule. The whole Pocket migration was in the works for two years, if I remember right, and in the months since, they still haven't updated their Firefox addon (which is still called 'Read It Later' and doesn't communicate tags properly with the mobile interface).

So I can see why some would prefer an app with regular updates, like Instacast.

[–]lilnizzle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And by Instacast, you mean Instapaper.

[–]FekketCantenel 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually, no. Instacast, the podcasting app, is my gold standard for regular updates when the users need them. I know it's a different genre of app, but I wish more developers followed its lead.

(I'll add a link to my comment above to make the connection clearer; otherwise, you're right, it looks like a typo.)

[–]lilnizzle 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You're right, it is frquently updated. Their 2.0 was somewhat controversial, with them removing a feature that was included in 1.x releases and offering it as an in-app purchase (I think I got that right).

[–]FekketCantenel 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I didn't see what the big deal was. I'd wanted push notifications for the longest time, and if the dev wants to charge $1 for them, I'm happy.

Might have been that you need to get the upgrade in order to edit playlists, but he's fixed that since. Again, fast update schedule helps.

[–]lilnizzle 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I'm with you on that one but was just relaying the topic.

I also found out recently that it costs money for developers to offer push notifications, regardless of whether they charge for it or not.