I disagree, the headline is correct. I acknowledge that the GOP candidate is maliciously hiring homeless people to distract and fracture the democratic process in a hotly contested state. But, there are several consequences you can safely infer from the article without taking a leap in logic. First of all, angry voters that will neither vote for Republicans and Democrats will vote for another candidate (possibly random homeless guy.) Secondly, some voters who traditionally back Green party candidates will immediatly back this candidate. Lastly, and the cause of this headline: what sociopolitical network or resources does a homeless person have? Many other homeless persons who bank on each other for resources. Friends of the candidate will, in turn, vote for the Green party. Sadly enough, the homeless man would probably be a much stronger candidate than either party.